|
Canadian Immigration Consultants |
Immigroup |
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Home > Immigration > Immigration Articles |
d | ||||
|
Law
and Business Review of the Americas Fall,
2002 Comment
and Casenote USING
IMMIGRATION AS A PROTECTIONIST MECHANISM WHILE PROMOTING FREE TRADE Melinda
McGehee Copyright
?2002 by Kluwer Law International, The Hague, The Netherlands; Melinda
McGehee Table
of Contents I.
Introduction
II.
Annex to Chapter 16--Immigration Provisions III.
European Union and Immigration
IV.
The Problem ... and Now the Solution
V.
Conclusion
I.
Introduction
Chapter sixteen of the North
American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) "reflects the preferential
trading relationship between the parties" as it covers the
temporary entry for business persons. NAFTA is a free trade agreement
that not only must set guidelines for trading--the movement of goods and
services between Canada, Mexico, and the United States--but also for the
movement of people. If the people cannot functionally and efficiently
travel from one country to the next, then clearly trade under NAFTA
would be inhibited. Goods need to be delivered to the respective country
and of course, services need to be provided--neither of which can be
done without the movement of persons.
However ridiculous or simple
this issue of allowing people to cross borders appears in order for
productive trading, it has become a realistic concern and has indeed
caused frustrations under NAFTA. For example, simply by analyzing
article 1601 "General Principle," one begins to understand the
inherent contradictions within. Article 1601 "declare[s] the fact that the NAFTA's immigration provisions should reflect the 'preferential trading relationship between the parties, the desirability of facilitating temporary entry on a reciprocal basis and of establishing
|
|||||
|
Home | Firm | Services | Representation | WorkVisas | ImmigrationVisas | Business | Employment | Govt | Sitemap | Archive | Contact | Disclaimer |
|||||