Canada Immigration and Citizenship News

   Canadian Immigration Consultants

Immigroup

canada immigration, independent class, independent immigration, business class, business immigration, family business class, investor, entrepreneur, self-employed, business visa, provincial nominee, family class, live-in-caregiver, refugies canada immigration, independent class, independent immigration, business class, business immigration, family business class, investor, entrepreneur, self-employed, business visa, provincial nominee, family class, live-in-caregiver, refugies

   Home > Immigration > Immigration Articles

  d

  

  

Copyright ?span style="mso-spacerun: yes">  2003, West Group; Benjamin A. Kranc

 

 

December 15, 2003

 

UNDERSTANDING CANADIAN IMMIGRATION LOGISTICS

 

 

When you look at a foreign legal system, it may sometimes seem, well, foreign.

 

  In addition to the obvious geographic proximity of the U.S. and Canada, there is also linkage between these two countries in terms of legal, political, economic, security, and other issues. For those dealing with immigration law, there is often the need for us to understand each other's systems, at least at a basic level. Whether for issues of corporate or business matters, or of asylum or humanitarian-based immigration, there can be and often is a connection or overlap between the Canadian and U.S. procedures. As such, again, a basic understanding of the Canadian system can be a useful tool for U.S. immigration law practitioners.

 

  This article provides an overview of Canadian immigration law terminology, the bodies involved in the adjudication of immigration matters and their roles, the various procedures that may arise, and an understanding of the interactions among those involved. As such, whenever facing the need to deal with the Canadian immigration system, one should at least be equipped with the knowledge of the basics of what is going on and who is dealing with it. The discussion  therefore has a "horizontal" component, in terms of who is involved, and a "vertical" component, in terms of the types of decisions being made. Included with this article is a chart outlining the major types of decisionmakers in the Canadian immigration system, and the kinds of decisions they make. The chart is reproduced in Appendix I of this Release.

 

  Canada implemented new immigration legislation, the Immigration Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), in June. IRPA is having a profound impact on procedural and substantive issues in Canadian immigration law. This legislation has created a new structure for the administration of Canada's immigration laws and policies, and is the starting point for any consideration required on an immigration issue. The act has also spawned related regulations (IRPR), where much of the meat has been added to the legislative intent.  Beyond this there are also government manuals which, though not law, are often considered in questions of implementation of procedures and policies.

 

  Two basic bodies generally encompass the functions of Canadian immigration law processing and adjudication: (a) the Immigration Department, which has both overseas and inland functions, and (b) the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB), which has three divisions: the Immigration Division, the Refugee Protection Division (RPD), and the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD). The Immigration Department is responsible for the administration of immigration processes and decisions; the IRB handles the litigious aspects of immigration. This article also looks at the mechanisms and recourses from issues stemming from decisions in any of these bodies.  

   

 

Next Page

          

     

Home  |  Firm  |  Services Representation  WorkVisas  |  ImmigrationVisas  |  Business  |  Employment  |  Govt   |  Sitemap  Archive  Contact  |  Disclaimer

© 1994 - 2008.  Immigroup.  All rights reserved.